Coleman Tent Light

Sporting Goods : Coleman Tent Light

Coleman Tent Light

from: Coleman



 : Coleman Tent Light
See Larger Image

List Price: $16.99
Our Price: $10.66
You Save: -$6.33 (37%)
Prices subject to change.


Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours




Binding: Sports
Brand: Coleman
EAN: 0076501918724
Label: Coleman
Manufacturer: Coleman
Model: 830A250T
Publisher: Coleman
Release Date: 2005-04-18
Studio: Coleman



Editorial Review:

Product DescriptionColman Indoor Tent Light
  • Magnet Secures Light Without Harming Tent Material
  • Multi Mountable, Use For Tent, Closet, Shed, Etc
  • Powerful Xenon Bulb
  • Easy On/Off Switch
  • Operates On 4 'AA' Cell Batteries




    Features:
    • Magnetically secures to tent without damaging tent fabric
    • Portable and easy to use
    • Operates on 4 AA batteries
    • 1 Year warranty





    Accessories:
         see more

    Accessories:




    Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours


    Related Items:
         see more

    Related Items:



    banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
      banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

    Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

    Code:  security image
    Please enter the Code: 



    Customer Reviews
    Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

    Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Decent Light - Is It Necessary for Backpacking?
    Coleman makes good products, but this is more of a novelty item. The magnet feature is cool as you can virtually locate the magnet anywhere on your tent surface (easier to do with two people), by placing the magnet bar on the outside and light inside. The Xenon bulb puts out enough light to see what you are doing in your tent (I have a small two-man Eureka tent), but it definitely is not a reading light source. The four "AA" batteries that it needs will last for a good long weekend, but probably not a week. Also, keep in mind that it weighs about ten ounces with batteries if you are backpacking. However, it's a lot safer than a candle or a hot Coleman lantern. I would suggest a small pen-light would suffice for rough backpacking.



    Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Perfect for tents and gazebos!!
    Great light!! The magnet is VERY strong. We have a Columbian Gazebo on our patio. It's pretty large, the light is bright enough to make anything inside visible. Not too bright, everyone commented how nice it is. Perfect for our tent too!! For ten bucks it's a great deal!!



    Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Great light!
    This is a great light my only complaint is that I wish it was a tad bit brighter.



    Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - A for Idea, B for Execution
    The Coleman Tent Light is a great idea. This wedge-shaped light is backed with two powerful magnets and a removeable metal mounting plate. Take the mounting plate off, put the light wherever you want to in your tent, put the mounting plate on the outside of your tent behind the light and viola! You now have light, and it easily clicks on and off with one hand, which is important when camping. The magnets are strong enough to mount the light to either horizontal or verticle surfaces. It takes AA batteries and it's easy to get the unit apart to put the batteries in or replace them.

    In fact, it's too easy, and that is one of my complaints. The magnets are so poweful that pretty much anytime I take the mounting plate off, the light comes apart, too. I guess it's not that big a deal, but seems to me that it just could have been designed to avoid that. Things that continually fall apart have that "cheap" feel to them, and that's not what I want to feel when I'm in the middle of the woods. I want to have confidence in my gear!

    My second "complaint" is that the light is also not that bright. I put this in a four-person tent and it was just a little more dim than I would have preferred. It was certainly bright enough to see and get ready for sleep; this is not going to be a reading lamp, though.

    All-all-all, this is not a bad product and I'm happy I have it for the price at which it was sold. I just wonder if there maybe isn't something a little better out there.



    Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Like it a lot
    I like these lights quite a bit. We do not hang them in the middle of the tent, though, so I can't attest to it lighting up a whole tent (plus our tent is big, 15x12). We use these right above where we sleep in the tent for reading, etc. They hold well and don't pull on the tent too much. We use rechargeable batteries in them, too, so I don't know how fast they go through regular batteries, and each takes 4 AA, so rechargeables would be a good idea. And yes, the lights are an oval shape, just as an FYI. They have a rubberized push button on/off on the side and the batteries are easy to put in and take out.





  •  



    Plasma TV
    Garden Shopping and Outdoor Reviews




    I've heard it said by Dave Winer and many many others: if only Dean had reinvested half the money raised into the Internet, then ...

    OK, so you're the Dean Campaign Chief Information Officer in August 2003. The money starts to roll in. $20 million over six months, $2-4 million per month.

    What would you spend the money on?

    1. What does your monthly budget look like?
    2. What is your application and infrastructure portfolio?
    3. How much will you allocate to maintenance?
    4. You're building from scratch, so what problems do you hope to avoid through wise architecture?
    5. What are your big milestones?
    6. Who are your key vendors?

    How do you spend in consonance with the campaign strategy?

    1. How will you use the Internet to bring offline voters into the campaign at the same numbers as radio or television broadcasts?
    2. What is your online strategy for responding to attack ads and opposition pundits in radio, television and print?
    3. Online community takes time to build and is very hard to organize geographically. What will you do to match the state-by-state primary schedule?
    4. What can you do with online services to serve the campaign in caucus states?
    5. You are preparing for Bush to launch in Spring 2004. What are your countermeasures to reach out to moderate Republicans online while the GOP uses its advanced voter email systems to barrage 200 million validated email addresses?
    6. How will you lower the cost-per-vote vs. the GOP?


    I've heard it said by Dave Winer and many many others: if only Dean had reinvested half the money raised into the Internet, then ...

    OK, so you're the Dean Campaign Chief Information Officer in August 2003. The money starts to roll in. $20 million over six months, $2-4 million per month.

    What would you spend the money on?

    1. What does your monthly budget look like?
    2. What is your application and infrastructure portfolio?
    3. How much will you allocate to maintenance?
    4. You're building from scratch, so what problems do you hope to avoid through wise architecture?
    5. What are your big milestones?
    6. Who are your key vendors?

    How do you spend in consonance with the campaign strategy?

    1. How will you use the Internet to bring offline voters into the campaign at the same numbers as radio or television broadcasts?
    2. What is your online strategy for responding to attack ads and opposition pundits in radio, television and print?
    3. Online community takes time to build and is very hard to organize geographically. What will you do to match the state-by-state primary schedule?
    4. What can you do with online services to serve the campaign in caucus states?
    5. You are preparing for Bush to launch in Spring 2004. What are your countermeasures to reach out to moderate Republicans online while the GOP uses its advanced voter email systems to barrage 200 million validated email addresses?
    6. How will you lower the cost-per-vote vs. the GOP?


    Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."

    I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.

    I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.

    I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.

    I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.

    Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.

    There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.

    Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants. 

    [a klog apart]






    Coleman Tent Light

    Shopping